The Cloudy Future of Photoshop

photoshop_cloudy_future

Adobe recently announced that all of their Creative Suite software products, which includes luminaries like Photoshop, Illustrator and After Effects, will be moving to a subscription-only, download-only, cloud-based business model. The good news is that you can get legitimate versions of all of these programs in a bundle for a paltry $50. The bad news is that your license expires after 30 days. You can no longer pay for an Adobe CS product once, and own it indefinitely. Going forward, they won’t even be called the Creative Suite any longer. Welcome to the Creative Cloud, everyone, where it’s always cloudy with a chance for clouds.

This is a gutsy move on Adobe’s part. It’s always seemed like their old business model, however flawed it may have been, was a key component to their success. Sure, there were gobs of people that used their products illegally, and legitimate customers would often choose not to upgrade until it was absolutely necessary. However, through it all, Photoshop has remained unchallenged. It’s Coca-Cola in a world without Pepsi.

It’s hard to convince me to subscribe to an expensive service. I’m one of only 17.8% of Americans that choose not to pay for cable television. Sign up for Hulu Plus? No thanks. If I’m going to watch network TV with commercials, I’d prefer not to pay for it. Cough up $80 a year for faster shipping with Amazon Prime? Nope. I’ll wait a few extra days for that thrilling box of diapers, thanks. My $7.99 Netflix streaming plan is the one rare extravagance I indulge in.

cc-overview-toolsIn the new Adobe reality, professional users will be relived of paying big bucks to upgrade to get the latest features, and newcomers will have a much more budget-friendly admission price to get access to the best tools. Those are two really positive aspects of the new business model. However, it’s the casual user of Photoshop that gets nudged out of the picture. When Uncle Bob wants to Photoshop the dog’s head onto Aunt Margret’s body for the Christmas Card, I don’t envisioning him dropping $50 to do so.

So here’s the big question: historically, how many casual Photoshop users eventually ended up becoming accomplished amateurs and pro customers? I can’t speak for everyone, but if Photoshop had been $50 a month all along, I doubt that I would have learned as much about the program as I have. Much of the glorious graphic design that you see on this site, such as my thumbnails, are the product of my ancient copy of Photoshop CS3.

If I paid $50 to use the Adobe Suite for a month, I would certainly feel pressured to make the most of it. That’s a positive, I suppose. You’ll feel compelled to use the stuff. You’d probably force yourself to take care of a bunch of projects that you would normally put on the back burner indefinitely. In other words, many, many dog heads would be placed on Aunt Margaret’s body—in short order.

Outside of Photoshop users, there’s a lot of drama unfolding around this business model shift. Obviously, the video people who recently switched to Adobe Premier following the icy reception of Apple’s Final Cut Pro X have the right to be upset. It’s a weird situation. Some people are really happy, and others are really upset. I’m neither. However, I can confidently tell you one thing: I am not going to pay $50 a month. Eventually I’m going to need a Photoshop replacement. Looks like, at long last, it’s time to bring out the GIMP.

We Miss You, MCA

I’ve been writing for a long time. In fact, I started when I was just a little boy. I wrote my name. I wrote the word “cat.” As the years passed, I wrote more and more words.

Out of all of the words I’ve committed to the page, my favorite piece, by far, was the essay I wrote the day MCA passed away, entitled Close Encounters with Adam Yauch.

It’s been a year since the we lost Mr. Yauch, so I decided to mark the occasion by posting some Beastie-related stuff. Also, if you’re near Brooklyn today, you can take part in MCA Day. But, hurry up. It starts at 11AM.

Continue reading

First Thoughts on the New Zoom H6

At long last, Zoom has announced the follow up to their popular H4n Handy Recorder, the new H6. Recently, when I shared my opinion on the new Tascam DR-60D, the first thing I looked for was more than two XLR inputs, and unfortunately, I didn’t see them. You can’t see the four inputs on the Zoom H6 either (in the press photos—at least), but they are there. So that’s a good thing. Continue reading

The Freefly MōVI M10: Embrace Dependent Filmmaking

movi

A new kind of camera gimbal called the MōVI was introduced last week by a company called Freefly, and the basic idea is that it’s a handheld version of an external camera mount for a helicopter. Like a Steadicam system, the MōVI (pronounced Moe-Vee) makes it possible to create shots that glide fluidly, as if the camera was floating through the surroundings with a dreamlike flow.

While a Steadicam system is really awkward looking in person (a nerd version of Robocop wearing a goofy vest), the Freefly MōVI is majestic, hypnotic, with an almost impossibly futuristic mechanical grace: Continue reading

Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera vs. Panasonic GH3

Today at NAB 2013, Blackmagic Design shocked the production world the second year in a row with the announcement of their new Pocket Cinema Camera. It packs much of the same punch as last year’s groundbreaking Blackmagic Cinema Camera, in a more compact form factor—at one third of the price. Continue reading

Audio Test: Zoom H4n vs. Tascam DR-40

I recently published a post where I carefully explain the differences between the Zoom H4n and the Tascam DR-40, two competitively-priced portable digital recorders that both feature dual XLR inputs.

In this post, I compare the actual performance of these two models by testing the quality of their built-in mics, how well they perform with a phantom-powered external mic (a hyper cardioid Audio-Technica 4053b), and also how they sound when connecting directly to a camera using a Sescom attenuation cable Continue reading

Obituary for the GH2

Panasonic recently discontinued the Lumix DMC-GH2, a tiny, unassuming interchangeable lens camera that produced such remarkable images that it directly challenged some of the finest cameras ever made, and sometimes won.

The most defining moment for the GH2 occurred during Zacuto’s annual camera performance competition, called the Revenge of the Great Camera Shootout 2012. When the participants blindly reviewed the footage from the tests, and were tasked with choosing their favorites, acclaimed film director Francis Ford Coppola picked a hacked GH2 over several high-end cinema cameras that were, to say the least, drastically more expensive. Continue reading