Zoom H4n and Tascam DR40

Tascam DR-40 vs. Zoom H4n

If you need a portable digital recorder that features XLR inputs, and you don’t have lots of cash to spend, there are two options that stand out: the Zoom H4n and the Tascam DR-40. I created this post to help you clearly understand the differences between the two, and to share my opinion as to which is the better choice.

At the outset, the Tascam has the advantage of being around $100 less expensive, which is a considerable sum. One can only assume the vast majority of people would see the lower price of the DR-40, and their decision would be made on cost alone. But, in case you’re wondering how these two models differ in form, function and user-friendliness, please read on.

From a sheer vanity standpoint, the Zoom H4n looks a little more impressive in your hand. There are more illuminated buttons on its face, and it just has a more polished appearance. From a more practical standpoint, the exterior of the H4n is coated with a slightly rubber-like substance, which won’t protect the recorder if you accidentally drop it, but it does help you keep a better grip on the device.

In contrast, the exterior of the DR-40 is just raw, run-of-the-mill plastic. In fact, before you put the batteries inside of it, the DR-40 feels like a nearly hollow plastic box. Remember, the DR-40 is notably less expensive, and fittingly, this comes at a price.

Zoom H4n compared to Tascam DR-40
The DR-40 is slightly larger than the Zoom H4n

If you try to judge the sizes of these two recorders by looking at photos on the Internet, the DR-40 sometimes appears smaller. However, this isn’t the case in person. Both models are nearly the same size and shape. They’re too bulky to slip into a pocket, unless you’re wearing cargo shorts, which isn’t an issue if you live in North America, because you’re likely wearing them as you read this. If you live in France, these recorders will definitely not fit into your pants.

Cargo Shorts

Even though these recorders look strikingly similar, the way you operate them is notably different. The majority of the commands on the H4n are carried out with a side-mounted push-button wheel and Menu button. These aren’t a common set of controls, and likewise, it feels unusual operating them. The other downside is that the push-button wheel has a cheap vibe.

An aspect that many people find confusing about the H4n is that it operates in three separate modes: 2CH, 4CH and MTR. 2CH stands for two channel, meaning that it’s a two-track stereo mode. You’re either recording with the two built-in mics or the mic inputs, but not both at the same time. 4CH stands for four channel. This mode is for people who want to record four tracks at a time, using both the built-in mics and the external inputs.

MTR mode stands for multi-track mode. This mode is for musicians who want to treat the H4n as a portable recording studio. In MTR mode, you can lay down a track, and then overdub another track on top of it. This mode doesn’t really have a purpose for people who use the H4n as an audio recorder for video productions.

Tascam DR-40 compared to Zoom H4n
The locking XLR inputs on the DR-40 cause it to lean forward a bit.

Most of the controls on the DR-40 are carried out on the face of the device, and most of the buttons are labeled, which makes it slightly more intuitive. However, power is turned off and on by pressing and holding the Stop button. The Stop button has a third function as acting as the Home button. The sliding Power/Hold switch on the Zoom H4n is much nicer.

I used the DR-40 on a shoot, and I connected the XLR outputs of my Sound Devices 302 field mixer to the XLR inputs on the DR-40. One of the great advantages of the DR-40 is that the XLR inputs can be switched to accept a line-level signal. I’ve read threads on various forums where people claim that you can send an H4n line-level signals through 1/4″ cables on its combo-XLR inputs, but I’ve never tried this. Personally, I don’t want a workaround for this function.

Similarities both models share:

  • Dual XLR inputs
  • Built-in stereo condenser mics
  • Ability to record four tracks simultaneously, using XLR inputs and built-in mics
  • Can supply phantom power
  • Both can record 24-bit 96kHz
  • Record to removable SD cards
  • Nearly identical size and weight

What makes them different:

  • XLR inputs on DR-40 can be switched to accept line-level signals
  • The H4n has a stereo 1/8th input for mics
  • The DR-40 features locking XLR inputs
  • The DR-40 takes three AA batteries, the H4n only takes two
  • An AC adapter is included with the H4n, only batteries come with the DR-40
  • The H4n can act as a computer audio interface
  • The H4n comes with a very useful form-fitting plastic case

Cases exist that can protect these recorders as you use them, however, they’re kind of expensive. In the past, I made a post about how an inexpensive strap called the Canon Metal Neck Strap 1 can be used with the Zoom H4n, and I’m happy to report that the same strap works on the Tascam DR-40.

Tascam DR-40
I’m wearing the DR-40 as a necklace in this shot.

Sound Quality

I did a simple shoot out of the built-in mics on both of these recorders. I set them both up in a quiet room, adjusted the input levels so that the meters were landing in the ideal spot (if you don’t know how to do this, be sure to read my How to Set Audio Levels post). I spoke into the mics, and played acoustic guitar and sang.

I listened back on my Sony MDR 7506 headphones, and both recorders sounded decent. At first I thought I liked the sound of the Zoom H4n better, but the longer I listened, the less I could tell the difference. Neither recorder is great. They’re pretty much equal in sonic performance, which is usually the case with these inexpensive portable recorders. NOTE: I have since switched to using Senal SMH-1000 headphones and I like them.

UPDATE – A few weeks after this article was posted, I had the opportunity to carry out a more extensive shootout between these two recorders. Check out the shootout video and article HERE.

If I didn’t own either of these recorders, I would probably buy the Tascam DR-40. It’s a lot cheaper, and for my needs, it does pretty much the same thing as the Zoom H4n. However, if I didn’t own any other audio gear, and I had no plans to every buy a field mixer, I would get the Zoom H4n. The Tascam DR-40 isn’t better than the Zoom H4n. The winning feature in my case is that it has a physical switch to use the XLR inputs to record a line-level signal.

Being able to record line-level signals is an important feature for anyone who uses a field mixer. I use a Sound Devices 302 when I record, and many HDSLR shooters use the Sound Devices MixPre-D. When you use a good quality field mixer as the front end, you only use the recorder as a “bit bucket,” which means that you’re not using its preamps or mics. You’re just plugging in a line-level signal, and recording a high-resolution audio file with the device.

Some of you have probably read this far into the article hoping to hear about the preamp performance between these two units. Welp, I didn’t really test them out. I just assumed they’re both subpar. I will likely make a little shoot-out video with these two recorders, and I’ll try to test their preamps out then, and see if I can hear a discernable difference in their noise floors.

So I’ll leave it at that for now. Remember, if you found this article helpful, you can support this blog simply by clicking on the links in the article before you make a purchase on Amazon.com. If you decide to pick up a Tascam DR-40, click on it. If you want to go with the Zoom H4n, click on that baby. Thanks again!

Purchase links:

Zoom H4n - Amazon USA, B&H PhotoAmazon.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr
Tascam DR-40 - Amazon USA, B&H Photo, Amazon.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr
Sony MDR7506 Headphones - Amazon USA, B&H Photo, Amazon.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr
Senal SMH-1000 Headphones - Amazon USA, B&H Photo, Amazon.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr
Sound Devices 302 field mixer - B&H Photo
Sound Devices MixPre-D - B&H Photo

Published by


Writer, musician, photo taker and video maker. When not writing somewhat longish articles for this blog, I write incredibly short things on Twitter: @SamMallery

32 thoughts on “Tascam DR-40 vs. Zoom H4n”

  1. I fail to see the difference between the two in regard to XLR and 1/4″ line inputs. One requires that you switch to select and the other does it automatically. Why would you call that ‘a work around’?
    Cut and paste from the description of the H4N
    “For connecting your own microphones or instruments, the H4n features XLR/TRS combo input jacks with phantom capability.”
    I have neither, using a Zoom H2 which is sufficient for my current needs so have no prejudice either way.

  2. Hi Frank. The manual for the H4n states that you can connect mics or instruments, but they don’t mention “line-level” signals. When they mention instruments, they’re referring to guitars and basses, which have a Hi-Z signal. Hi-Z is a different animal from line-level, which is a much stronger signal. The H4n doesn’t have the ability to accept a line-level signal. Anyhow, I appreciate that you took some time to read my article and leave a comment, and I’m glad your H2 is serving you well.

  3. Thanks for the review. I have two Zoom H2 recorders and am planning to get a 4 track. I have a home studio built around a high end PC as well as a Sound Devices USBPre2 as a sound card for recording to a laptop. I love the sound of the H2 for capturing new sketches of melodies and tunes as a musical diary. I carry a guitar, camera and H2 everywhere I go pretty much. Sometimes I use the H2 to record live band practices.

    My question is: could I use my field recording USBPre2 to capture two external condenser microphones and send these into the Zoom H4n (or Tascam D40) as I record multiple tracks? The sound quality of the Sound Devices unit would be much superior to the Zoom. My biggest complaint about small condenser mics on the Zoom and Tascam is that they do not record well musical sound below 200 hertz. ie bass frequencies.

    Thanks again for your wonderful review….I read every word twice and a few three times!!!


  4. BTW is there any way to preserve all 4 tracks as separate track to be sent or captured on the SD card? If this recorder mixes all 4 tracks consistently to just a stereo mix it is not really a 4 track recorder….just a fancier 2 track recorder.

  5. I’m having so much trouble deciding on which one to get. At this point in time, both are the same price. And since this is more than a year later, does everything in this review still apply? Or have there been updates to the devices? I don’t plan on getting a field mixer any time soon, so I’d like one that will work well on its own, with an external mic and internal mic, with as little unwanted noise as possible. Do you still recommend the Zoom H4n if I’m not using a field mixer? Or do you think Tascam has corrected those issues in the DR-40?

  6. You’re over thinking it, Beverly. Seriously. Close your eyes and buy either one. Use the energy that you’re expending towards the projects that you want to create. Use that energy towards cooking a delicious meal. You can’t lose either way. Buy either one and make something you care about with it.

  7. You and several other reviews made issue of the Tascam DR-40 from $50 to $100 cheaper than the Zoom 4hn. Current pricing from Amazon & Sweetwater has both models selling at $199.99. Price is an important factor for buyers.

  8. Really helpful appraisal of the Zoom and Tascam recorders. Nicely written and laid out. It’s convinced me to go for the H4N.

    As a blogger myself I can appreciate the time and effort involved in building a blog and a stockpile of relevant articles. Fine tuning can take years so that everything is ‘just right’. To the uninitiated it’s easy to criticise.

    Keep up the good work.

  9. Sam thanks for taking the time to publish this comparison and your video. Seems that many of us are caught on the barbed wire between these two recorders. I co-host a podcast and recently discovered a video showing me how to set up either of these two recorders to record skype calls for interviews. In that both are now within rock throwing distance of one another regarding price I have decided on the H2N. Thanks again!

  10. Thanks for that. I’ve been using a H4n for years in a tropical superheated, super salty, super humid environment that killed the last laptop, a macbook, in under a year… without a murmur of dissent. I don’t even keep it covered any more. I use it mostly to record guitar but i can only use the effects in MTR mode, which is slightly irritating. My only other quibbles are.. it eats batteries (we live off grid with little power), and getting around the interface is clunky. The effects andxaudio quality are not xcellent, IMO. I doubt the Tascan would suit me better.?

  11. Thanks for that. I’ve been using a H4n for years in a tropical superheated, super salty, super humid environment that killed the last laptop, a macbook, in under a year… without a murmur of dissent. I don’t even keep it covered any more. I use it mostly to record guitar but i can only use the effects in MTR mode, which is slightly irritating. My only other quibbles are.. it eats batteries (we live off grid with little power), and getting around the interface is clunky. The effects and audio quality are excellent, IMO. I doubt the Tascan would suit me better.?

  12. Hi, thanks this is a really interesting article! I’m looking for a good sounding digital recorder to record my stereo mixes direct from the mixing desk at mixdown time. Presumably, the DR40 better suits my needs as I can record at line level and bypass the internal preamps? I would then import the stereo wavs into my computer and master them in wavelab or send them to my mastering engineer. Best wishes, John

  13. Es difícil encontrar su blog en el navegador, necesita backlinks con DA alta.
    Sé lo que puede ayudarle. Buscar en google por:
    Burol’s Tips Outsource The Work

  14. Hi Adam great article as I’m currently considering these 2 recorders. Which would you recommend if I only need it specifically for line-in recording for a DJ set? Line/Record Out source from the DJ Mixer to the recorder. I’ll likely need to get a pair of RCA attenuator to reduce the signal. Much appreciated.

  15. Hi Jin,

    That’s an easy one… For recording the audio from a DJ mixer, I would definitely recommend the Tascam DR-40. It has much better line-level input capabilities.

    Thanks for commenting,
    Sam (not Adam :)

  16. Hi Sam

    I’ve the same question as Christoph above: Is one better than the other in terms of sound quality if I wanted to connect external microphones? I don’t understand a lot of the jargon associated with these devices so bear with my ignorant questions- is one more appropriate than the other if i wanted to connect two external microphones (as in if i want to record two speakers together). I am a phonetician so i am interested in the finer details of the sounds..



  17. Hi Liz,

    Thanks for posting a comment! It’s okay if you don’t fully understand all of this technical jargon. The ultimate goal for this blog is to help people like yourself.

    As far as which recorder sounds better for use with two microphones… that is a bit subjective. Some people like the sound of the Zoom H4n more than the sound of the Tascam DR-40, and vise versa. The bottom line is that they both sound good, so you can’t go wrong either way.

    Be sure to listen to the shootout I made between these two recorders, so you can decide for yourself which one you like better – http://wp.me/p4TlQS-GF

    As a phonetician who is interested in the finer details of sounds, you should also put some thought into what kind of microphones you’re going to use, and, how you plan on positioning the mics when you record. Those factors will make a big impact on the overall quality of the recordings you make, regardless of which recorder you choose.

    Thanks for visiting and engaging with this site. Good luck with your audio pursuits!


  18. Hi Sam,

    Thanks for the help! Will be getting the Tascam DR-40 :)

    Apologies in getting your name wrong. I’ve no idea why I typed Adam lol :p


  19. I currently use a $60 Sony mono MP3 recorder for all of my recording needs. However, I have recently thought about purchasing one of these two PCM recorders to record my church band called praise and worship. It is a rock type setup with electric guitar electric Bass drum kit digital piano vocals and a few miscellaneous percussion items such as wind chimes and bells. Additionally I would also use the unit to record performances from my local libraries talent show off which is mainly acoustic guitar and vocals. However I would not be using the units with any XLR inputs or anything like that just simply with the two built-in mics. I’m sort of tied between the two of the units and any input on which one would be better for my needs is accepted. I was advised by a few friends that the Tascam would be more viable but any additional help would be accepted thanks

  20. Hi Ian. Between these two, the Zoom H4n offers a little more functionality for musicians. It can be used as a USB audio interface for computer recording, plus it has a built-in tuner and some other stuff. But, chances are good that you may never use any of those features. Your friend didn’t steer you wrong by recommending the Tascam, but they’re both so similar, they wouldn’t be steering you wrong by recommending the H4n. My advice is to get the one that you’re leaning toward in your gut. That should be the deciding factor.

  21. Thanks Sam. Another friend gave me a catalog which has the H4N solution package for $199, which is said to include the recorder and, I assume, some accessories, which seems to be a better deal in the long run. Another thing I’m wondering, are the files from both able to be downloaded from my computer to my smartphone via Drag & Drop from the removable disk folder? Mind you, I have a brand new, Windows 10 touchscreen Lenovo, and these recorders were first manufactured when Windows 7 was still the norm. Although, I don’t see why it wouldn’t be possible, as my Sony mono unit is a pre- Windows 10 model, 2013 to be precise, and it works just fine. Thanks again!

  22. I’ve never dragged and dropped files from the recorder to a phone, but I’ve never needed to. I use Macs, too. You’ll have to discover on your own if that’s possible. Enjoy!

  23. Thanks for all your help Sam! Once I purchase whichever unit I decide,I’m most definitely going to find out personally about the drag n drop matter. in 2007, i did owned a, then, higher end, Olympus DS-2,with stereo recording, although not Linear PCM, and at one point did record a local band at a benefit dance, with quite good results. This is actually going to be my first time owning a Linear recorder..

  24. Hi Sam,

    I have both the Tascam DR-40 & the H4n. I’m a brass player and I will be recording jazz combos, my big band and solo brass instruments for lessons. I do not plan to use external mics at this time since I do know the best places to place the recorder from the sound source. Which recorder would be optimal for me?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.